Online Tour Subscribe
profile image of stephen

John Mayer’s “Waiting On The World To Change” Is Pretty Sick, Irresponsible Song When You Think About It

During my drive to work the other day, John Mayer’s song “Waiting on the World to Change” came on the radio. I guess I never really paid that much attention to the lyrics before, but listening to his words, I came to a sudden realization: this is the most whiny, aimless social justice song I’ve ever heard.

Let me break down the lyrics for you so you can feel me.

Me and all my friends
We’re all misunderstood
They say we stand for nothing and
There’s no way we ever could

Okay, so far, so good. Typically whiny lyrics about disenfranchisement and powerless young adults and teenagers.

Now we see everything that’s going wrong
With the world and those who lead it
We just feel like we don’t have the means
To rise above and beat it

Our first sign of trouble. Okay, we’re still just complaining at this point. All of the classic protest songs usually start this way. But Mayer doesn’t seem particularly angry yet. Where’s the call for violent overthrow? Where’s the demand for money to be taken from the rich and given to the poor? The Clash this certainly is not. If Joe Strummer was still alive, he’d be very bored. That is if he wasn’t flipping off the Queen or something.

So we keep waiting
Waiting on the world to change
We keep on waiting
Waiting on the world to change

Our chorus, ladies and gentleman. Are you serious? I mean really, is that your message? You don’t feel like your part of the system, so you’re just going to wait for it to change all by itself. That, sir, is insanity.

It’s hard to beat the system
When we’re standing at a distance
So we keep waiting
Waiting on the world to change

Hold on: you said it’s hard to beat the system, when you’re standing at a distance? Wow man, just wow. I tell you people, the entitlement generation has arrived. But it’s worse then that. No, let’s get this straight. You don’t want to be part of the system, hence your standing at a distance from it. Yet at the same time, you want to beat it. I’m sorry, you don’t *beat* the system. You change the system or maintain it, you don’t beat it. The system is what keeps everything working. The sad part is that it isn’t always a fair system, hence the need to make changes. But you don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater and expect for things to be better.
Now if we had the power
To bring our neighbors home from war
They would have never missed a Christmas
No more ribbons on their door
And when you trust your television
What you get is what you got
Cause when they own the information, oh
They can bend it all they want

Okay, let’s get this straight. Somehow, within eight straight lines, we jump from having the power to end wars to complaining about access to information. Well let’s deal with the first part first. I’m not sure what sort of squishy world Mayer lives in, but singing about bringing neighbors home from war is a loaded argument at best. Yes, I know war is an awful thing, but just how exactly does he propose doing all these altruistic things without some authority behind it? Or was he instead wishing for Godlike powers to end war altogether? If that’s the case, I would love to have one of those food replicators from “Star Trek,” but I know that isn’t going to happen.

As for the second part about information, boo on that. What is this, the 1960s? It’s like every paranoid conspiracy about one central group owning information. I have two issues with this. One, we live in one the most information-saturated ages imaginable. There is no “they” holding onto all the information; you have multiple news sources on multiple different mediums, all competing for your attention. They don’t get it by regurgitating the same stuff everyone else is saying. And second, even if *they* did own the information, you’ve been singing about your apathy for the system and how nothing you can do will change it. It’s that sort of attitude that allows people to be manipulated.
It’s not that we don’t care,
We just know that the fight ain’t fair
So we keep on waiting
Waiting on the world to change

Cry me a river. What you really want to say is, “The world is so unfair. Why doesn’t somebody fix it! I can’t do it, I’m too busy Twittering!” Gee Mr. Mayer, maybe the reason why the current generation feels so helpless is because they’re so self-absorbed with instant gratification and pop culture that they’re not capable of making any changes that require more than 10 minutes of their time.

You know, say what you want about the hippies, at least they went out and did stuff. They set out and tried to change the world. Now, the world they wanted was weird and freaky to anyone who wasn’t dropping five microdots of blotter, but at least it was something. They didn’t do their activism in front of a computer, in between watching YouTube videos.

And we’re still waiting
Waiting on the world to change
We keep on waiting, waiting on the world to change
One day our generation
Is gonna rule the population
So we keep on waiting
Waiting on the world to change

I hope you and your slacktivist ilk never rule anything more then some “World of Warcraft” dungeon, sir.

So that’s it, really. It’s the perfect song for people who like to complain about things but somehow just don’t have that motivation to get out and fix the world’s problems. Don’t ask me to make the world change, I’m too busy playing video games, MySpacing and other disinterested behavior that lead to my being shut out of the system to begin with.

–Stephen Payne, Editor, Oil and Gas Investor This Week; www.OilandGasInvestor.com; spayne@hartenergy.com


You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

6 Responses to “John Mayer’s “Waiting On The World To Change” Is Pretty Sick, Irresponsible Song When You Think About It”

  1. This song is not about whiny young adults and teenagers. It’s not about being lazy and not pro-active. It’s not about people who complain about the world but don’t have the guts to do anything. It has a deeper meaning…far beyond your knowledge of politics and the way the world is ran. Take an example such as being gay. Thirty years ago or more, the idea of being gay was not socially acceptable. My grandparents and parents would never imagine a day that gay marriage would even be an issue. Myself, being 22 years of age, I grew up with gay friends. I grew up with it kind of as a normal thing. I don’t frown upon it I just accept it. Of course one could argue religious componenets all day. However, that’s not the point. This is just an example. The people who are in Congress and Supreme Court are all older who have that “old-fashioned” mindset. That will fade out eventually, just like 8-tracks, cassette players, cd’s, and now dvd’s are fading. The world is changing….it’s not that my generation cannot do anything, but in time things will start to change because that’s just how it is. There is so much more to this song that I don’t have time to go into, not that you could grasp what I’m saying anyways….but I just wanted to say that your explicit interpretation of this song is greatly uneducated. Yeah pretty much your interpretation just sucks.
    Love, peace, and happiness.
    JAS

  2. JAS,

    Well put…I second your motion… It is sad to see people, like Mr. Payne, so narrow minded… Like a good friend of my mine once said, “Well, you can either be part of the problem or part of the solution”… We need more people like you and John Mayer, if we ever want to reach that solution…

    ~One Luv~

  3. How much of a loser do you have to be to go on a website and completely break down a song to an exact science. Think about the music you like. It could be made to look bad, if it even has a meaning.

  4. Wow, maybe I should criticize pop music more often, it sure seems to get the responses.

    Quite frankly, the song is an empty feel-good tune. It makes you think it’s supposed to be uplifting, but then when you analyze the message, Mayer has no point to make other than sitting back and waiting you turn to change the world. That’s some of the worst slacktism I’ve ever heard, and the fact this is treated as some sort of anthem for our time is all the more sadder.

    You want revolution? Listen to Rage Against the Machine. John Mayer is for spoiled college students complaining about how unfair the world is between drinking Starbucks and waiting on the check from mommy and daddy to clear.

  5. I enjoyed your post, and even though I haven’t heard the song… knowing John Mayer’s music and reading the lyrics I can guess. It’s indeed terribly shallow, and the argument that you can only talk about music you like is incredibly stupid.

  6. A) “More sadder” is not grammatically correct.
    B) Rage Against the Machine kinda sucks, and everyone knows it.
    C) I don’t even really like John Mayer, except in his John Mayer Trio incarnation, but, in his defense, it’s not like he ever said the song was supposed to be the rallying point for the generations malcontents. I think the others are right; the song isn’t about revolution - it’s about social attitudes and mores, what people accept as moral and right.

Leave a Reply